Can You Be Your Own Defender At The Court?

Unless your case is a minor dispute, or you are against another person not represented by a lawyer as well, being a defender for yourself in court is extremely difficult and risky to fail. Most people who represent themselves in court, especially if they are against a party represented by a lawyer, do not win the case. If you are forced to defend yourself, you must prepare a defence, fully understand court procedures, and provide evidence and witnesses at each stage of the trial. Therefore, you should visit our website and use the services we provide. One of the cases we handle is Valeant Shareholder Lawsuit.


However, if you insist on becoming a lawyer for yourself, here are some things you can do. You should learn the legal terms that refer to any party involved in the litigation. The judge or lawyer of the opposing party will name each party by its legal term. The parties involved are among others:

– The term pro se refers to the person or group of persons involved in a civil or criminal law case but is not represented by a lawyer. If you are preparing a defence for yourself in a legal case, you will be called a pro-se defender.

– A plaintiff is a person or group of people who file a civil lawsuit (legal case due to material loss) to another person or a company. If you are involved in a civil law case, not a criminal law case (the difference is described below), the plaintiff is the person who filed the lawsuit with you. Plaintiffs may be represented or not represented by lawyers.

– The prosecutor is a lawyer representing the state in a criminal law case.

– In the case of civil law, the plaintiff sues a person whom he thinks has harmed him in one or more ways, resulting in a loss. There are different types of civil lawsuits that can be incurred, such as personal injury, divorce, acts of discrimination, or breach of contract.

– In the case of criminal law, the claimant presents evidence to the judge (or to the jury, in a system of illiteracy in the US) in an attempt to prove that the accused person (in this stage is called the defendant) commits a criminal offence. The judge or jury accepts the evidence and defence provided, then decides whether the claimant has provided sufficient evidence to show that the defendant is guilty of violating the criminal law.